Junk Science and Our Text Books

Why are many of the science textbooks in our children’s classrooms suspect?  The quick answer is in the politically correct age, the book publishers are using junk science to espouse there suspect agenda.

Of course this comes into play in the realm of the evolution education debate.

Pamela R. Winnick writes a great article in "The Weekly Standard", A Textbook Case of Junk Science  documenting some of the junk science.

Error: Unable to create directory wp-content/uploads/2024/04. Is its parent directory writable by the server?

About waynem

As a Minnesota based photographer and artist I have been greatly influenced by the Upper Midwest. I focus my skills and energies on portraits, landscapes, cityscapes, architectural and fine art work. My best work comes from images first painted in my mind. I mull over a prospective image for weeks or months, seeing it from different angles and perspectives, then finally deciding what to capture. The result is images that deeply touch people's emotions and powerfully evoke memories and dreams. My images are used commercially by companies and organizations ranging from Financial Services firms, mom and pop Ice Cream shops and The Basilica of St Mary to communicate their shared vision and values. Book and magazine publishers have featured my images on their covers. My photographs also grace and enhance the decor of many fine homes.
This entry was posted in Cultural Commentary, Science and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Junk Science and Our Text Books

  1. Karl Priest says:

    Following are facts extreme evolutionists don’t want the public to know.
    1. I am a recently retired public middle school mathematics teacher in West Virginia with over 30 years experience as an educator including administration.
    For the last five years of my full-time career, with the full knowledge of State, County, and ACLU officials, I demonstrated to my students that mathematics proves beyond the shadow of doubt that evolutionism is nonsense. The students saw that the evidence clearly shows that every item associated with humans, animals and plants are Intelligent Designs and Intelligent Design is science because it is observable by billions of people trillions of times, always has been, always will be. I always let them figure it out for themselves and allowed them to believe what they chose, but at least they were exposed to the scientific facts that extremists want to censor from the minds of public school students. After the lesson a student from an atheist family said, “Evolution is silly.”
    2. Currently, as a substitute teacher, I have contact with more public school students than ever and take advantage of every opportunity to provide them with the facts described above.
    3. Evolutionists are bluffing when they say their beliefs are scientific. Be sure to look at the list of evolutionists who refuse the debate challenge from my friend Dr. Joseph Mastropaolo. See the list at http://www.csulb.edu/~jmastrop/. Click on the Life Science Prize at the bottom.

Comments are closed.